Key Points:
- Kim Kardashian blamed ChatGPT for her poor law exam results, calling it a “toxic study partner.”
- The AI gave confident but often wrong answers, making her studies misleading.
- Despite this, she remains committed to finishing her law career and becoming a lawyer.
Kim Kardashian has offered a candid look into her unusual study methods, revealing that she relied heavily on ChatGPT while preparing for her law exams—only to blame the AI tool for her disappointing results. During a recent on-camera conversation that involved answering questions under a lie detector test, the reality star admitted that she regularly fed exam-style questions into the chatbot, hoping for clearer, quicker explanations.
Kardashian described how she often snapped photos of her practice questions and submitted them directly to the AI, expecting accurate guidance. Instead, she said, the tool consistently produced the wrong answers, ultimately causing her to perform poorly on several assessments.
Frustrated by the outcome, she joked that she frequently ended up arguing with the chatbot, telling it, “You made me fail! Why did you do this?” Her remarks highlight both the modern temptation to depend on quick digital help and the academic risks that come with relying on imperfect AI tools.
A Flawed, Emotional-Sounding “Frenemy”
Kim Kardashian didn’t just portray ChatGPT as academically unreliable—she described an almost emotional dynamic with the bot. She recounted moments where the AI not only provided incorrect answers but followed up with messages encouraging her to “trust her own instincts,” making the interaction feel oddly personal.
She characterised the tool as a kind of “frenemy,” someone who acts supportive while simultaneously steering you in the wrong direction. This repeated pattern of confident yet incorrect assistance left her questioning the effectiveness of using generative AI for something as precise and analytical as legal study. When asked whether using the chatbot might be considered cheating,
Kim Kardashian brushed off the notion and instead emphasised how unhelpful it had been overall. She admitted to frequently sharing screenshots of ChatGPT’s misguided responses with her friends as proof of how misleading the AI could be. Her account reflects an increasingly common criticism: while AI models sound authoritative, they are prone to confident mistakes—something that can be particularly damaging for students preparing for professional certifications.
Staying Committed to Law Despite AI Missteps
Even with the setbacks, Kardashian remains determined to complete her legal journey. She previously passed California’s “baby bar” exam, a notoriously difficult milestone for first-year law students, and has recently concluded her law program. She noted that she expects to be fully qualified soon and has openly shared her long-term ambition of becoming a practicing lawyer. Kardashian even joked that within a decade she could imagine “giving up being Kim K” to focus entirely on trial work, an idea she said she genuinely finds exciting.
Her story serves as a timely reminder that while AI can be a helpful tool for general research or brainstorming, it is not a reliable replacement for rigorous study, expert instruction, or professional legal training. As AI becomes increasingly integrated into academic life, Kim Kardashian’s experience underscores the importance of verifying digital information and maintaining traditional study practices.
Her candid admission not only sparked public discussion about the reliability of AI in education but also highlighted the broader challenges modern learners face as they navigate the growing intersection of technology and professional development.
Visit more of our news! CIO Women Magazine
