Priscilla Presley’s former business partners have filed a lawsuit seeking more than $50 million, alleging that they were misled in their work to revitalize Presley’s brand. Brigitte Kruse, a prominent auctioneer, and entrepreneur Kevin Fialko claim they invested years of effort and significant capital to enhance Presley’s image, only to be sidelined and accused unjustly.
The lawsuit follows a previous legal action initiated by Presley against Kruse and Fialko, which alleged misconduct in handling her personal and financial affairs. The former partners argue that their efforts were focused on developing Presley’s name, image, and likeness (NIL), turning it into a commercially viable brand while she reportedly concealed prior licensing arrangements.
Building and Enhancing Priscilla Presley’s Brand
Kruse and Fialko say Presley approached them in 2021, seeking assistance to stabilize her financial position. The duo devoted thousands of hours to deploying their expertise in branding, marketing, and intellectual property management to strengthen her public profile and commercial presence. They claim to have formed multiple business entities specifically to capitalize on Presley’s NIL and maximize opportunities in entertainment, collectibles, and public engagements.
During this process, they allege Priscilla Presley withheld information regarding a prior $6.5 million deal in 2005 with Elvis Presley Enterprises that sold the rights to license her name. According to the lawsuit, Presley initially denied the existence of the agreement and later attributed it to forgetfulness when presented with documentation. Kruse and Fialko contend that this lack of transparency undermined their efforts and complicated brand development strategies.
The former partners also highlight their involvement in brokering a 2023 deal related to the Presley estate, reportedly securing $2.4 million for Presley while navigating negotiations with heirs. They claim that Presley terminated their involvement shortly after, despite contractual obligations, and publicly criticized their contributions.
Strategic Contributions and Industry Expertise
Kruse and Fialko emphasize that their work brought tangible results to Priscilla Presley’s brand. They applied IP strategies, marketing know-how, and creative initiatives to elevate her profile, both in traditional media and through merchandising. Their efforts leveraged Presley’s long-standing public recognition and recent renewed visibility from major film projects, including Baz Luhrmann’s Elvis (2022) and Sofia Coppola’s Priscilla (2023), along with her ongoing acting legacy from the Naked Gun franchise.
The lawsuit asserts that their expertise in entertainment, collectibles, and brand management was instrumental in positioning Presley’s image for commercial opportunities, highlighting the importance of skilled business partners in nurturing and monetizing the careers and legacies of female public figures.
Kruse and Fialko stress that their experience in branding, auction markets, and entrepreneurship uniquely equipped them to support Presley’s ambitions. They aim to clarify that their investments of time, capital, and professional expertise were meant to enhance her long-term brand value and maintain her prominence in the public eye.
Legacy and Continued Influence
Priscilla Presley remains a high-profile figure decades after her early rise to fame, with continued influence in entertainment, fashion, and media. The recent focus on her brand underscores the commercial significance of celebrity name, image, and likeness management—particularly for women in the public eye navigating both creative and business opportunities.
By highlighting the roles of knowledgeable partners in building and safeguarding a brand, the case illustrates the intersection of entrepreneurship, strategic management, and female empowerment in maintaining and expanding personal legacies.
Visit CIO Women Magazine to read more.
